Understanding the difference between civil and criminal cases is essential, especially for victims seeking justice. While both types of cases aim to address wrongdoing, their purposes, procedures, and outcomes differ significantly.
A criminal case is initiated by the government against an individual or entity accused of breaking the law. Its primary goal is to enforce public justice, holding the defendant accountable for criminal behavior. Punishments in criminal cases can include fines, probation, or imprisonment. Victims may receive restitution, but this is not guaranteed, particularly if the defendant is acquitted.
In contrast, a civil case is filed by an individual or entity (the plaintiff) seeking compensation for harm caused by the defendant’s actions. Civil cases focus on resolving disputes and addressing personal or financial harm. Victims of crime who do not receive restitution in criminal proceedings or whose perpetrators are acquitted may pursue compensation through a civil case.
Civil cases offer several advantages. The burden of proof in civil cases—preponderance of the evidence—is lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal cases. This means victims may succeed in a civil case even if the defendant is not convicted in criminal court. Additionally, civil cases allow family members to recover damages in wrongful death claims and enable victims to hold multiple defendants accountable.
At 770GoodLaw, we understand the complexities of both civil and criminal cases and are committed to helping victims and their families secure the compensation they deserve. Contact us today for a free case review, and let us guide you through your legal options to pursue justice and financial recovery.